Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Hate Speech/Fighting Words/Chaplinsky, Mak, and Reyonlds.

Hate speech is, outside the law, any communication that disparages a person or a group on the basis of some characteristic such as race, color, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, religion, or other characteristic. The Court defined fighting words as those words that "by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace." Fighting words are excluded, the Court reasoned, because any benefit derived from their utterance is outweighed by the social interest in order and morality. I find it interesting that the Jevaoh Witness didn’t get introuble for passing out his literature and denouncing religion, but he got introuble for personally saying fighting words to a cop.
The Obama article focused on the idea of how in the United States of America there is a big controversy having Barack Obama as our President. Although it was a short article, there were many opinions stated about Obama that make this country seem very racist and cold. The beginning of the article started off by relating Obama’s healthcare reform proposals to a reason of why people do not like him and is being compared to Adolf Hitler because of his actions of taking over the country with proposals like this. Majority of this article were filled with quotes and opinions of citizens in the U.S. and what they think of Obama, mainly criticizing him. I found most of these quotes very disturbing to read, especially the racist opinions. The first strong “anti-Obama” quote I found was by Glenn Beck when he said on radio that “Obama is a racist with a deep-seated hatred for White people.” Tom Eisenhower compared Obama to Hitler and he said, “I’d take a gun to Washington if enough of you would go with me.” Pastor Steven Anderson from a church in Arizona even criticized Obama by saying, “Why I hate Obama, I’m going to pray that he dies and goes to hell.” All of these opinions were very disturbing to read but at the same time these people have the freedom of speech, but in my opinion the first two quotes were said by racist who don’t approve of Obama because of his skin color. When I read the quote from the pastor it made me second guesses if Obama is unsuitable for being President. The New York Times wrote in an article that “Some people just can’t believe a black man in president and will never accept it.” I thought this was a very strong quote because there are many extremist groups in the United States and also racist uninformed citizens who may not understand that having an African-American president will be different in many ways, so they choose to dislike Obama, instead of giving him a chance. Another idea that came up in this article was the idea of the South’s attitude towards having Obama as President. The African Americans are not qualified to lead this great country is the mentality of these Southern American citizens. In conclusion, I believe that all of these negative opinions are being said because of ones upbringing and that is how they judge whether or not Obama is right for the position of President of the United States. Therefore, I believe that everyone despite their personal opinion and beliefs should leave Obama alone.
The “Time to Kill the Wealthy article focused on  several New York Lawmakers receiving freighting emails that tell them to tax the rich. The Email reads the following, “How hard is it for us to stake out one of the obvious access roads to some tech company, tail an employee home and toss a liquor bottle full of flaming gasoline through their nice picture window into their cute house,” The angry message demanded that Albany politicians “stop shoveling wealth from the lower 99 percent into the top 1 percent” and “set aside your ‘no new taxes on anybody’ pledge.” So basically they must pass the bill, or they will die. It is an easy choice to do because only 3 percent of the state population would be affected by the decision. In my opinion this is not hate speech, this is just a warning o inform people what they should do.

Is Hate Speech in the Media Directly Affecting Our Culture?


I believe that just because freedom of speech is protected under the First Amendment, does not justify if one’s cultural, religious, and personal beliefs are mocked and judged through the media. Being familiar with hate speech, I thought that after reading issue twelve it would be easy to agree with Henry Giroux, who argued that hate speech in the media is directly affecting our culture, but I found it difficult to understand him. In contrast, I found it easier to read Georgie Weatherby and Brian Scoggins research and examples focusing on the idea of how hate speech in the media is not affecting our culture. I believe that Giroux focused his research on the idea of culture cruelty and how entertainment media and information are creating violent behavior in our culture. The example that Giroux used was the beating of homeless people and how the National Coalition for the Homeless claimed that people on Youtube are posting videos with titles like “bum fight” and showing actual footage of individuals beating and mocking the homeless. I thought this was an excellent example of why hate speech (hate videos) in the media are affecting our culture in a negative way because people are judging and assuming that this is how Americans are to the homeless. The reason I found it easier to read Weatherby and Scoggins research was because they explained specifically what hate speech is in our society by using examples like hate sites of four extremist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, the National Alliance, the Neo-Nazi, and the Aryan Nations. One of the main points that I thought was interesting that Weatherby and Scoggins brought up was the idea that these groups are trying more to inform the public about their beliefs versus recruiting them into their group. Another main point that they brought up was how the media, such as the Internet allows the group to reach a wide range of people that may believe in what they do, and hopefully recruit them. Weatherby and Scoggins also mention that hate sites are not showing exactly what they want on their site because they want to appear “friendly” so individuals will join their group. In conclusion, all though Weatherby and Scoggins brought up excellent points, I personally believe that hate speech in the media is affecting our culture, having individuals think its ok to beat a homeless person and discriminate against Jewish or Arabs. People are already facing the reality that hate speech is leading to Stereotypes and that is becoming part of our culture. 

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Are People Better Informed in the Information Society?

After reading both sides of the Arguement, both sides have valid points. I would have to say that people are much better informed in the information society. The reason I sided for the information society is because when you look at how far we have come in the past 20-15 years it is amazing.  People can find out the latest news around the world with a click of a mouse, and colleges are receiving record amounts of applicants. As we read in the article, Linda Jackson does a test with students from the ages of 10 to 18 seeing how there test scores are affected when they use the Internet more often. The results showed that kids who used the Internet more had higher scores on standardized test of reading achievement and higher GPA's. From these test results how can you argue that the Internet and media have a negative effect on people? However I do agree that Internet usage should be limited to a certain amount of hours each week because kids do tend to abuse the privilege of the Internet. Also another reason people are more informed in the information society is because instead of people sitting around asking themselves questions and wondering about the answer, people can get on their computers and research anything they want. With the way technology is constantly growing and expanding I think that the Internet will be essential in the future for our youth and no matter how much you may argue that were better off without the Internet, the Internet will still grow and over power any objections you have towards it. The future will be a very technology savvy era and I think it will go down in history as one of the greatest and most important times that the world has ever seen. Although we have all of this technology to help us on our journey to information. We still live in a world filled with a majority of uneducated people.